As written in the title:

I prefer getting up early rather than rushing at the last minute.

Why do I have to include ''rather" when it already makes sense if you omit the 'rather' word. So it goes specifically like this:

I prefer getting up early than rushing at the last minute.

Right? Doesn't add up really... kindly elucidate this one


In this case, it's wrong to omit "rather" because it won't sound right. (It doesn't sound right to me as a native speaker.) This is because "than" is not preceded by a comparative (or followed by one, if the order is inverted). There needs to be a comparative, such as:

Getting up early is better than rushing at the last minute.

Compare these definitions for than and rather than, for example.

Here's a little history, as a bonus:

A very long time ago, it would have been OK to omit "rather", such as in:

The Apprentices being encouraged herewith [...], than to do nothing, brake open some Prisons.
The life and raigne of King Henry VIII, 1649

It looks like this construct was last used sometime in the 1600s (and at that point, as you can see, spelling and capitalization were a little different than they are now). The passage itself does sound very weird to me.

| improve this answer | |
  • Agreed. You could, for fun, split the better/than & make it appear at a quick glance to only be relying on the 'than'. "Better to get up early than rush at the last minute." – gone fishin' again. May 28 '18 at 8:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.