1

How would a native speaker understand such a sentence?

She truly believes in the power of diversity and collective intelligence

  1. She believes in the power of diversity AND SHE ALSO BELIEVES in collective intelligence

  2. She believes in the power of diversity AND ALSO IN THE POWER OF collective intelligence

5
  • 1
    She believes in both the power of diversity and collective intelligence.
    – Enguroo
    Jun 8, 2018 at 9:52
  • @Enguroo hi, if i wanted to emphasize the power as referring to both objects, would i absolutely invariably have to use it twice or at least duplicate the preposition OF? Jun 8, 2018 at 10:15
  • 1
    If you want to, you can say "the power of diversity" and "the power of collective intelligence" but to me it sounds tautological. You'd better say "She believes in the power of diversity and the one of collective intelligence". Don't use "of" without "the one" in this case because "the one" is used instead of "the power" to avoid the unnecessary use of two words to express one meaning.
    – Enguroo
    Jun 8, 2018 at 10:30
  • You are very welcome!
    – Enguroo
    Jun 8, 2018 at 14:42
  • 1
    One can indeed use "...of diversity and of...". Reads quite natural. (Though i'd pluralize "power" if doing it.)
    – cHao
    Jun 8, 2018 at 19:35

1 Answer 1

2

The statement is ambiguous.

If collective intelligence can have the attribute of power then diversity and collective intelligence can both be objects of preposition of.

If collective intelligence cannot have the attribute of power, then the power of diversity and collective intelligence are the objects of preposition in.

The meaning would involve a semantic decision.

She believes in the veracity of his remarks and three square meals.

The statement is grammatical but odd on a semantic level since it involves two somewhat different meanings of believe in, one meaning for the first object and another for the second object. Also, three square meals cannot have the attribute of veracity.

If the meaning of the verb is the same for both objects, and both objects can have the attribute in question, as in your examples, then there is no such oddity. But it is not absolutely clear that the attribute power applies to both, and you would have to repeat power if absolute clarity was your goal and you did not want to change the sentence structure.

If your question isn't merely of an academic nature and you're looking for writing strategies, you could rephrase the sentence in any number of ways. Here's one:

She believes diversity and collective intelligence are both powerful.

2
  • thank you, i come from the angle of a translator, so am trying to figure out what the author as a native speaker could have had in mind Jun 8, 2018 at 14:18
  • 1
    Most native speakers would understand it to mean that she believes diversity and collective intelligence are both powerful (in some way).
    – TimR
    Jun 8, 2018 at 14:26

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .