0

Are these all considered comma splices. I wasn't sure as they refer back to the clause before the comma directly as apposed to just similar ideas. In which case a semi-colon would be used.

Any exceptions to this rule.

Space: What it is, what it isn't.

Every time I close my eyes I remember his laughter, his infectious smile.

I won't win it, I just want to get through it.

  • Space: what it is, what it isn't isn't really a complete sentence anyway, but more like a headline, so you can't really say that it is or isn't a comma splice. – stangdon Jun 15 '18 at 17:01
  • They are arguably comma splices. You could avoid any ambiguity if you added a conjunction to each. But note that even though comma splices are syntactically unsound, they can still be stylistically acceptable and understood. – Jason Bassford Supports Monica Jun 15 '18 at 19:30
0

A comma splice is a flaw in punctuation, but not a grammar mistake. If two complete sentences are joined with a comma we call it a comma splice.

The first one is a headline, it consists of three noun phrases "Space", "what it is" and "what it isn't". There isn't a complete sentence here, so it can't be a comma splice. A comma is fine, a semicolon is fine too if you prefer.

The second also doesn't join two complete sentences: "his infectious smile" can't be a sentence. What you have is basically a list of thing that are remembered, and lists are usually separated by commas

The third does have two complete sentences, and so it is a comma splice. These look to me like complete sentences. I would use a full stop:

I won't win it. I just want to get through it.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.