Is the following sentence natural?
Gorillas have often been portrayed as a fearful animal, but in truth these shy apes rarely fight over sex, food, or territory.
The subject Gorillas is plural, but a fearful animal is singular.
Add a comment
|
First of all note the difference between fearful & fearsome
I suppose you could make the jump from singular to plural without anyone noticing, but I'd do it using the comma as your 'jump-point'...
The gorilla has often been portrayed as a fearsome animal, but in truth these shy apes rarely fight over sex, food, or territory.
Otherwise use
...portrayed as fearsome animals, ...
& stick to the plural right through.
After comments -
Yes fearful could also be used - however, if there is any chance of ambiguity don't use it.
A fearful noise, fearful wind, fearful storm - inanimate objects could not be confused as being afraid.
The field mouse has often been portrayed as a fearful animal...
Really?
answered Jul 3 '18 at 12:54
-
1+1 for guessing (as I did) that "fearsome" may have been the intended sense.– CCTOJul 3 '18 at 15:30
-
2Fearful and fearsome have the same meaning in some contexts (e.g. fearful creature = creature to be feared). See, for example, definition 1 at Dictionary.com.– alex_dJul 3 '18 at 21:18
-
1'Fearful' can indeed be used to mean both 'frightening' and 'tending to 'fear'.– PharapJul 4 '18 at 6:26
-
2@alex_d Even if that definition is recognized by some, "fearsome" seems to be the better choice, as it is less likely to be mistaken for "being afraid". - "Fearful", as of definition 3 at Dictionary.com can mean "afraid", too. But it is not what I would be thinking of, if I read it anywhere. - I would suggest sticking to the prevalent meaning and never, ever using it for the other, as a service to understanding amongst the peoples. :) Jul 4 '18 at 8:03
-
1@alex_d I am a 60-yo native BrE speaker, and I read "fearful animal" as "an animal tending to fear". (Particularly as David Attenborough has been portraying them as actually that since 1979.) Jul 4 '18 at 12:22
The plural gorillas can be understood as a reference to the species as a whole, hence a "fearful" or "fearsome" animal, whatever the intended meaning is.
Kangaroos have often been portrayed as a pugnacious animal.
There is no obligation to see it as a plural or to see it as a reference to the species. It can be either.
But some would prefer to say
The kangaroo has often been portrayed as a pugnacious animal.
-
2It seems that the singular "animal" in such examples means "a kind of animal." But can I apply the same reasoning and say "John sees comics as an interesting book," meaning "an interesting type of book"?– ApollyonJul 3 '18 at 13:51
-
4It is not the singular alone. The article contributes to the meaning. A pugnacious animal refers to an abstraction, an animal with the quality "pugnacious". He says comics are a subversive genre. Comics have often been portrayed as a subversive genre.– TᴚoɯɐuoJul 3 '18 at 14:29
-
2There are numerous idiomatic phrases that follow the root structure "[plural] are a [singular]". For example, "Mosquitos are a nuisance." I don't know of a name for that sort of structure, nor can I find a source for what singular nouns are valid in such a structure. Jul 3 '18 at 15:09
-
2
-
2