[a] She has been suffering from a lack of sleep lately.
[b] Her problem is lack of sleep. ([a],[b] both are from Webster’s Advanced Learner’s dictionary)
[c] It is not a lack of love, but a lack of friendship that makes unhappy marriages. (Brainy Quote)

Why does [a] have a, and [b] doesn't? And why does [c] have a?

  • 1
    Personally, I would put the 'a' in all three, but you can also leave it out of all three if you want. I don't see any real difference between [a] and [b] that makes [a] more deserving of an 'a' than [b]. There are times when you need the article, but you don't for any of these sentences. Feb 8, 2014 at 14:39
  • 1
    Don't know the rule, but all these examples work fine with or without "a."
    – hunter
    Feb 8, 2014 at 15:45

1 Answer 1


The beauty of the flexibility of the word "lack" means we can use it with or without the word "a". Since it often refers to an intangible (perhaps uncountable) concept such as "lack of sleep" - where "lack" is defined by one's perspective of what constitutes "a lack" - we can leave the article out.

This leads us to it being a flexible word.

She has been suffering from a lack of sympathy.

Her problem is (a) lack of sleep.

These options are fine. It is preferred to put "a" before, to produce a countable noun which seems more correct (so your sentences sound better with "a").

Compare "lack" to "shortage". "Shortage" can only refer to concrete nouns (or things). Since this word is less flexible, we are obliged to use "a".

A shortage of water means country-dwellers are...

A shortage of much-needed penicillin has meant that...

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .