0

I have this sentence.

If shouldn't helped him this tragedy might not happen.

Should I include have after shouldn't? shouldn't have helped doesn't sound fine to me. shouldn't helped either.

1

Normally, you wouldn't use shouldn't in that sentence. The subject needs to be used there instead:

If we had helped him, this tragedy might not have happened.

Or, we can use the present tense, if there is still time to avert the tragedy:

If Paul helps him, this tragedy might not happen.

We might work in a should, like this:

We should help him; otherwise, a tragedy might happen.

| improve this answer | |
2

If you want to use should in past tense in the context that helping him would have prevented a tragedy, you might phrase it as

I should have helped him. If I had, this tragedy might not have happened.

But since you used shouldn't and not should, maybe you believe that your help might have caused the tragedy, and in that context you could phrase it as

I shouldn't have helped him. If I hadn't, this tragedy might not have happened.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.