0

This question already has an answer here:

Which ones we should use:

  1. the global population

  2. global population

marked as duplicate by Tetsujin, FumbleFingers, ColleenV Aug 2 '18 at 17:15

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • In many contexts it's a (sometimes "meaningless") stylistic choice. Note that Google Books claims over 6000 written instances of with a global population [of some specified size, for example]. – FumbleFingers Aug 2 '18 at 16:45
0

You would usually talk about the global population

The global population is likely to exceed 9 billion within 10 years.

But in some contexts the indefinite article might also be used:

Earth's resources could not support a global population of more than 10 billion.

It would be correct to omit the article entirely when using such constructions as global population growth.

Global population growth is likely to strain earth's resources within 50 years.

  • 1
    I'm not convinced there's any significant argument in favour of specifically endorsing the "article-less" form when global population is being used as a "compound attributive noun", modifying some noun such as growth. There's nothing at all wrong with, say, with global population approaching [however many billions it was approaching when those words were being written]. – FumbleFingers Aug 2 '18 at 17:01
  • @Ronald Sole.......... my question is that I could not distinguish different between your 2 first examples. Why for the first one you used "the" but for the second one, you did not? – mehrane Aug 2 '18 at 20:13

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.