Should I use 'haven't occurred' or 'hadn't occurred' in the context?

  • Yesterday a tragic bus accident happened in Kolkata. At least 60 people died in the accident. The bus driver was found responsible for the accident. It is not that accidents like this hadn't occurred/haven't occurred before but the number of deaths had never risen/have never risen to that point before.

     

     In the above context which tense I should use?

I think if I use present perfect it mean before now but as the accident happened yesterday I think I should use past perfect.

up vote 1 down vote accepted

You can use either. It does not depend on the events, or their sequence. It entirely depends on how you want your text to be focussed temporally.

If you use the past perfect, you are talking about what happened previously from the point of view of a point in the past - presumably viewing it from the time of yesterday's accident.

If you use the present perfect, you are locating the temporal viewpoint now.

Both are completely grammatical. Both are completely consistent with what you are describing. The difference is only in the point when you are inviting the reader to imagine their temporal viewpoint.

  • Thank you very much. But I think in the last sentence "the number of deaths have/had never risen to that point before." I should use past perfect. What do you think? – user254288 Aug 9 at 22:26
  • No, @user254288. My answer still applies. Either is possible, depending on whether you want the reader to be looking back from the accident, or looking back from now. – Colin Fine Aug 10 at 16:26

Your Answer

 
discard

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.