-2

He replied that she no longer knew who he was, that she had not been able to recognize him for 5 years now.

Is the second that used correctly here?

1

Yes, the second that is fine since it furthar adds something to replied that. Here are a few similar examples;

  1. It had first been suggested that he be skinned alive, that lead be poured into his entrails and that he be let to starve.
  2. If you know that something unpleasant will happen, that you will go to the dentist for example, or to France, then that is not good.
0

The second "that" is required by parallelism. It means that "He replied" is common to the two clauses, and the meaning must be clear and correct when splitting the clauses, without any other transformations.

He replied that she no longer knew who he was.

He replied that she had not been able to recognize him for 5 years now.

However, if the second "then" is missing, the second clause becomes after splitting:

He replied she had not been able to recognize him for 5 years now.

which is incomplete.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.