2

What are the differences between the following to sentences? Are they all correct?

  1. Jack introduced me the beautiful world of mathematics.
  2. Jack introduced me to the beautiful world of mathematics.
  3. Jack introduced the beautiful world of mathematics to me.
4

Version 1 is incorrect, as "introduce" can't be ditransitive.

Version 3, using "introduce" (something) to (someone), is awkward at best.

Version 2 is good:

Jack introduced me to the beautiful world of mathematics.

  • 1
    In support of your point about introduce something [non-sentient] to someone being "awkward" (non-idiomatic), there's this Ngram showing that it's almost always introduced him to art, not introduced art to him. – FumbleFingers Aug 15 '18 at 13:45
  • 5
    @FumbleFingers ‘the program is a bid to introduce opera to the masses’ – Eddie Kal Aug 15 '18 at 15:51
  • 1
    @EddieKal: Yeah - the general preference is as described (but it's nowhere near an "unbreakable rule" anyway). But some more "abstract" parties to an introduction (the masses, the general public, a wider audience, etc.) are normally mentioned second, regardless of whether the other entity is non-sentient (opera) or a named individual (the young Mozart). Not exactly sure how accurately one could define & describe that area where the general principle is completely reversed though. – FumbleFingers Aug 15 '18 at 16:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.