0

Which sentence with punctuation mark is correct?

Sentence 1:

The lack of information regarding this matter is what has led me to make the objective of this investigation: to answer this question.

Sentence 2:

The lack of information regarding this matter is what has led me to make the objective of this investigation to answer this question.

Sentence 3:

The lack of information regarding this matter is what has led me to make the objective of this investigation - to answer this question.

3
  • Can you please show some real examples — the contrived ones don't seem to make sense with or without punctuation. Commented Aug 23, 2018 at 20:47
  • 1
    In terms purely of punctuation, numbers 1 and 3 are both correct. But the problem does not lie in the punctuation. All the variations are so verbose and so vague that correct punctuation does not make any of the variations intelligible. I think what you want to say is something like: The lack of accessible and reliable information on X has greatly hindered analysis. The purpose of this report is to provide such information. Commented Aug 24, 2018 at 1:32
  • Punctuation is stylistic and subjective. There is nothing really wrong with any of these sentences when it comes to their punctuation or lack thereof. Commented Aug 24, 2018 at 2:50

1 Answer 1

1

Actually i think only (2) is strictly correct if you want to say "the objective is to answer this question."

Compare:

I made the objective: to answer this question.
I made the objective to answer this question.
I made the objective - to answer this question.

If you had a instead of the, (1) and (3) would be more correct.

I made a new objective: to answer this question.
I made a new objective to answer this question.
I made a new objective - to answer this question.

This is because X: Y and X - Y mean that Y is an example of X, and not Y = X.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .