The Guardian has recently published an interview with Kurt Volker, who stated that:
“We can have a conversation with Ukraine like we would with any other country about what do they need.”
Why is he using inversion?
2
-
2It's an error -- there should be no inversion: "...about what they need". The italicised element is a subordinate interrogative clause (embedded question). The meaning is “We can have a conversation with Ukraine like we would with any other country about the answer to the question 'What do they need?'" – BillJ Sep 1 '18 at 16:23
-
2This is a transcription of a conversation - so the interviewee may have been speaking stream-of-consciousness or less formally, and thus dropped that 'do' in. Or perhaps intended that to be an interior quotation - "We can have a conversation ... about 'what do they need?'" – John Feltz Sep 1 '18 at 16:40
2
This sound like something that happens occasionally in conversation. In spoken conversion though, it would come across more naturally.
Think of it like this: “We can have a conversation with Ukraine like we would with any other country about X.” Where X is the question "what do they need?".
In other words, "we can have a conversation with them about the question: what do they need?"
