0

I saw this phrase: "to look the horse in the mouth" and remembered that there are many more such phrases out there.

What are such constructions called and how do they function?

  • Your cited phrase can be the subject of a sentence. – Lucian Sava Sep 12 '18 at 17:16
  • 1
    I really don't understand this question. Are you asking why look there is like the transitive verb punch when it normally takes a prepositional phrase, as in look at him? – Tᴚoɯɐuo Sep 12 '18 at 18:14
  • 2
    Don't you mean "verbs with the object right after them"? – Laurel Sep 12 '18 at 21:06
  • @Laurel Why object? Isn't "the mouth" the object? – SovereignSun Sep 13 '18 at 3:48
  • mouth is the object of the preposition but is not the object of look. Someone can look you in the eye. – Tᴚoɯɐuo Sep 13 '18 at 18:01
1

Never look a gift horse in the mouth

This is a common English aphorism that means, "Don't be too critical about gifts you receive". It's phrased as an imperative, so it's like a strong suggestion or command.

Many aphorisms are similarly phrased as imperatives:

Look before you leap. (Take reasonable precautions before you do anything risky)

Don't count your chickens before they hatch. (Don't assume an outcome before it actually happens)

If it ain't broke, don't fix it

When in Rome, do as the Romans do. (when in a different country or environment, act according to the customs and habits of that culture)

Don't judge a book by its cover. (don't assume superficial appearance tells you everything about something)

and various others. However you can phrase almost any statement as an imperative, if you want to use it as a request, command, or demand:

Look both ways before crossing the street!

Finish your vegetables, then you can have dessert!

and so on.

  • This doesn't answer the actual question and is surprisingly mistargeted considering the level that SovereignSun has generally displayed around the site... – Luke Sawczak Sep 14 '18 at 4:54
  • @LukeSawczak OK, seems my answer is off-base. Does SovereignSun mean the object not the subject? I'm not sure why this would be unusual, e.g. "Meet me there" has a direct and an indirect object. It's pretty common grammar. – Andrew Sep 15 '18 at 16:05
  • I think he does mean the object — and specifically the absent of the phrasal element of "look at". – Luke Sawczak Sep 15 '18 at 16:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.