3

What is the difference between the following sentences?

He has failed the exam for the first time.

He has failed the exam the first time around.

Do those phrases have indentical meanings? If they do, than what is the point of using the word around in the second sentence?

1 Answer 1

4

No, they do not mean the same thing. Not only does around make the second sentence grammatical, but the use of for in the first sentence gives that sentence a different meaning.

He has failed the exam for the first time.

He may have written the exam five times before. But this time, the sixth time, he has failed it. It is the first time that he has failed it.

He has failed the exam the first time around.

This means that it's the first time he's written the exam—and that he's failed it.

The sentence construction is a bit odd, but it works if you think of somebody announcing the result immediately after the attempt—and just before he attempts it a second time.


Note the difference that around makes in variations of the sentence:

✔ He has failed the exam the first time around.
✘ He has failed the exam the first time.

✔ He failed the exam the first time around.
✔ He failed the exam the first time.

In the has failed version, the sentence becomes ungrammatical if you simply remove around. However, I can't really explain why this is the case.

The final version without around seems correct, but it is also awkward; I would add he wrote it to the end.

3
  • I am sorry I cannot get what the word "around" is there for.. Can it be omitted? Oct 7, 2018 at 9:27
  • He has failed the exam the first time. is ungrammatical. So, no. It cannot be omitted from that specific sentence construction. Consider: ✔ He walked around the block. ✘ He walked the block. I believe that around in your specific sentence acts similarly to "the first time going through the process." (But that full replacement wouldn't be correct either—it's just what around means.) Oct 7, 2018 at 10:00
  • I believe that, "the first time" is an adverbial phrase, therefore it is grammatically incorrect to omit the target of that adverb, which is "around" – see also, thegrammarexchange.infopop.cc/topic/first-time-round May 19, 2020 at 15:40

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .