I get confused when I read this sentence: "An increasingly efficient agricultural industry freed British workers for factory employment." Does the phrase "free...for..." exist? Does it mean "workers don't have to work in factories" or "workers are freed so that they can work in factories" here? I wonder how native English speakers interpret this sentence. Somebody please help me with this!

migrated from english.stackexchange.com Oct 7 '18 at 20:14

This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.

  • The improved efficiency of agriculture "liberated" workers from having to work in the fields. They were now (thenceforth) 'free' to work, instead, in factories. – Dan Oct 6 '18 at 15:19
  • In your cited context, to free [something] [up] means to release [from some existing role or duty] in order to make something available for another another purpose. Often more or less equivalent to repurpose. – FumbleFingers Oct 6 '18 at 15:20

To make available for other purposes.

“The advance of robotic assembly lines freed men to be able to do less menial work.”

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.