I have usually seen "a + adj + noun" instead of "adj + a + noun". In the sentence below, why the speaker used the latter? Did he want to transfer a special meaning e.g. emphasizing on the adjective, in this case the very long period that no one had expected? The situation was that the speaker went to the US for a meeting and suddenly he had to have an operation and stay a while in a hospital.

It's grand to be home again after so long an absence. [The Crown]


1 Answer 1


I can think of no syntactical reason why it would be wrong.

We can say all of these:

✔ An extended absence.
✔ A long absence.
✔ So long an absence.
✔ An absence so long.

So long is acting as an adjective, and we can put adjectives in front of and behind nouns.

So, why should the following be wrong?

✘ (?) A so long absence.

This seems simply like one of those situations where it sounds wrong "because it sounds wrong" situations.

Even though I can think of no logical reason for the phrase to be wrong, it's just not used idiomatically.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .