1

Some websites have varying answers regarding the placement of also(adverb) whether it should precede before the auxillary 'have' or after. Such as:

Whoever was in your shoes, they would also have done that.

Or

Whoever was in your shoes, they would have also done that.

Moreover, I believe that this website can help me clarify this up, because from other websites they are just opinion, weak-based answers. What is your answer to this?

  • 2
    Unfortunately, it is mostly just a matter of opinion. Both versions are grammatical. It's up to individual style and preference which to use. Note that there are two more variations: (1) move also in front of would, and (2) move also to the end of the sentence. – Jason Bassford Supports Monica Oct 12 '18 at 6:03
  • Excellent! I was bothered by this because I thought there is only one specific grammar rule where to put this also. I already know you can put ''also'' at the end of a sentence accordingly, I just forgot to write it hehe. Thx, you nailed that one on the head! – John Arvin Oct 12 '18 at 7:57
2

The difference between these 2 sentences are only a matter of opinion and preference, both:

Whoever was in your shoes, they would also have done that.

and

Whoever was in your shoes, they would have also done that.

Are grammatically correct.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.