0

In case of software development, architecture of a computer program is a set of approaches and rules how to develop and maintain a computer program. The architecture is divided by a few layers and for each of them it's needed to consider an approach how to implement this layer. This way, all these layers together are the architecture I am talking about.

So, how would you say:

I am going to learn some approaches to building a computer program architecture

or

I am going to learn some approaches to architecture design of a computer program

Any difference between them? Are they both grammatically correct?

  • computer program is slightly "naive". One usually sees software. – Lambie Oct 14 '18 at 14:07
  • "I am going to learn some approaches to building a house architecture" and "I am going to learn some approaches to architecture design of a house". Do either of these sentences make sense to you? – JavaLatte Oct 14 '18 at 14:26
  • @JavaLatte I am sorry but I don't understand what you mean by "make sense to me" and why the sentence starts from "Do" not "Does"? – Ivan Oct 14 '18 at 14:35
3

Your first sentence is OK. Your second sentence is clunky and not quite idiomatic.

It would be more natural to say:

I am going to learn approaches to architectural design in computer programming.

When we have an often-used adjectival form of the noun, as we do here with architectural, it is better to use that adjective than to use the noun adjectivally as an adjunct modifier.

architectural design

is more natural than

architecture design

P.S. You could also say

I am going to learn approaches to designing the architecture of a computer program.

That last version is potentially clearer than architectural design in computer programming, my earlier suggestion, since without further context the earlier suggestion might be understood to refer to using computers to design buildings.

|improve this answer|||||
  • thank you so much for the explanation. So it turns out both to learn approaches to building a computer program architecture and to learn approaches to designing the architecture of a computer program are correct. So this way, is there no difference between to designing and to building in this context? And another question: why did you put "the" before architecture? Why not "a" or zero article? – Ivan Oct 14 '18 at 14:24
  • 1
    @Ivan To design something is to draw it or outline it. To build something is to make it real. You can build something from a design. An architect works with designs; a construction worker works with building materials. – Jason Bassford Supports Monica Oct 14 '18 at 15:43
  • 1
    @Ivan: Why "the architecture"? Here, architecture is not being used as a subject in its own right, in which case there would be no article. (Frank Lloyd Wright studied architecture in school.) Rather, here it is just one of the attributes of a computer program. – Tᴚoɯɐuo Oct 14 '18 at 16:11
  • @Tᴚoɯɐuo this way, an android application architecture in my sentence you mentioned as OK means the same as the architecture of an android application in the last sentence you provided? – Ivan Oct 14 '18 at 16:45
  • @Ivan: I am not following you, sorry. There was no mention of Android in your first sentence, which I said was OK. Are you asking if we strike "computer program" from that sentence and substitute an Android application architecture in its stead? If so, an Android application architecture and the architecture of an Android application can mean much the same thing but they do not necessarily have the same meaning. an... suggests there might be multiple ways to architect an Android application; whereas "the architecture" suggests there is one right way to do it. It would depend on ... – Tᴚoɯɐuo Oct 14 '18 at 18:06
2
  • software architecture [is enough in your context]
  • the architecture of a software program [or software program architecture]
  • the architecture of a software application [or software application architecture]

I am going to learn some approaches to building or designing or creating software architecture.

computer program architecture does not sound right here and is somewhat redundant. Software architecture is more precise.

This article discusses this topic: software architecture

1) Computer architecture is one term:

"In computer engineering, computer architecture is a set of rules and methods that describe the functionality, organization, and implementation of computer systems. Some definitions of architecture define it as describing the capabilities and programming model of a computer but not a particular implementation.1 In other definitions computer architecture involves instruction set architecture design, microarchitecture design, logic design, and implementation." from Wikipedia

2) software architecture

"Software architecture refers to the high level structures of a software system and the discipline of creating such structures and systems."

additional question:

1) I'm going to build architecture for an Android application. [that will be my new job, to do that].

versus:

2) I'm going to build the architecture for an Android application. [I have already built the architecture for the or an iOS application.]

2) I'm going to build an architecture for an Android app. [as opposed to building a site for hosting Android apps.]

Like: I'm going to drink coffee at home today, not in a café.

|improve this answer|||||
  • thank you. Actually, I am going to talk about building an Android application architecture. So the question is: should I put any article before "Android application architecture (software architecture)" in my case? – Ivan Oct 14 '18 at 14:29
  • @Ivan This whole thing is about "an"? Right. Well, then: I'm going to build architecture for an Android app[lication]**". – Lambie Oct 14 '18 at 14:32
  • First, I was wondering whether to use building or designing in my case. Looks like it's clear now. Then I saw how @Tᴚoɯɐuo used "the" before "architecture", while you uses no article, while I thought "a" is needed in this context. Now I'm confused about using an article. Also, it got interested for me "of" or "for" Android application. – Ivan Oct 14 '18 at 14:49
  • @Ivan Your specific question about "(an) android application architecture" has already been asked (by you) and answered here. – Jason Bassford Supports Monica Oct 14 '18 at 15:49
  • @Lambie thank you for the clarification with articles usage. I think, your examples helped me a lot to completely understand my article problem. In particular, both zero article and the is not going to be a grammatical mistake in my sentence. And I will go with no article, since according to your example, it is exactly what I mean and need. – Ivan Oct 14 '18 at 17:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.