Man has no more right to say an uncivil thing than to act one

According to me the meaning of this phrase is:

Man has equal right to say an uncivil thing and to act an uncivil thing.

Am I right?


You are essentially correct. However, "equal right" leaves out some of the implication of the sentence - a more complete rephrasing would be something like

Saying an uncivil thing is no better than doing an uncivil thing.

The original phrase uses "no more" to emphasize not simply that the actions are equal, but that they are equal in spite of what others might think (that saying something uncivil is a lesser offence). It's calling attention to the fact that someone might think they have more right to the former, but that the writer does not agree.

  • I don't agree that the original sentence is saying that you have zero right: it might imply that, but it does not say it. – Colin Fine Nov 3 '18 at 22:40
  • @ColinFine After some consideration I changed my answer - I was over-simplifying. Thanks for the feedback. – Alan T. Nov 5 '18 at 17:12

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.