1

“Quality does not compromise.”

Do you think the sentence is natural? Even if it is grammatically correct, I think quality is something that "is compromised", since it doesn't have any power on its own to "compromise".

Back to the question. Do you think it's grammatically correct and natural? If not, how would you change the sentence?

2

This is a kind of slogan made by advertising people. Quality is personified, treated as if it could make judgments. It is natural enough in the sense that native speakers (at least those in the US) encounter such statements all the time if they are not living in the middle of the desert with no access to radio or TV or internet or print media.

People understand it to mean that a company interested in making products of high quality will not compromise in ways that would lower the quality, such as by using lesser materials, or allowing sloppier engineering tolerances, or employing inadequate quality control measures.

| improve this answer | |
2

The sentence is completely natural, and (to some extent) rather elegant. Whether it is also meaningful is open to debate.

As with any language, English is rich in figurative expressions, including metaphor. In this case "quality" is a personification of a larger concept, something like:

people whose intention is to produce good quality

or

the desire to produce good quality.

These kind of expressions are fairly common. Here are a few more related to quality:

"Quality means doing it right when no one is looking" - Henry Ford

"Quality is the difference between style and fashion - Giorgio Armani

"Quality is not an act; it is a habit" - Aristotle

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.