0

I want to reinforce the exact difference between these two prepositions used in the same sentence.

I'll go for a walk in the seaside.

I'll go for a walk at the seaside.

Is it grammatically wrong to say that we can use both?

migrated from english.stackexchange.com Nov 24 '18 at 14:19

This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.

2

There is no grammatical question here: it is simply one of usage.

At the seaside is idiomatic: in the seaside is not.

Go for a walking is not idiomatic: go for a walk is.

  • So, can't I use ''in''? – Enzo Nov 20 '18 at 17:02
  • It's grammatical, and it would be understood. But it's not what a native speaker would say. – Colin Fine Nov 20 '18 at 17:04
  • @Enzo If you use in people will notice and write it off as a non-native speaker error. – Dan Bron Nov 20 '18 at 17:06
  • @enzo I'd say the most common preposition is along the seaside or alongside the (beach / shore / sea). People don't normally go for a walk at the seaside either. (Although it's a lot more common than in the seaside, which is simply bizarre.) However, people do go for a seaside walk, which dispenses with a preposition altogether. – Jason Bassford Nov 20 '18 at 19:15
  • 1
    Walking 'in the seaside' would get your feet wet. – amI Nov 20 '18 at 19:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.