0

No#1 is a definition of the word "tact" in my dictionary.

  1. tact is the ability to avoid offending people when dealing with problems.
  2. tact is the ability that avoid offending people when dealing with problems.

Are these two all correct in grammar?
If then, what's the difference between them in meaning?

Thanks for your help in advance.

Improve this question

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
1

The second is slightly incorrect. If you're going to use a relative clause, then the verb "avoid" should match with the subject "that":

tact is the ability that avoids offending people when dealing with problems.

Otherwise both are adjective phrases that modify "ability" in much the same way, and (in this context) have more or less the same meaning. However, the second example is much less common. "Ability" + infinitive is the usual idiomatic expression:

She has the ability to improve her grades, if she only studies harder.

or, better yet:

She is able to improve her grades ...

I suggest you avoid using a relative clause with "ability". It has an affected nuance that only works in very limited contexts.

Improve this answer
1
  • avoid's', I made a mistake. Nevertheless, thank you for the correct explanation.
    – JS.Kim.
    Dec 9, 2018 at 9:58

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .