Let's say nothing could beat firsthand experience. And you say:

Nothing could get any better than firsthand experience.


Nothing can be better than firsthand experience.

Which is correct to express what I am really trying to say?


In normal conversation, this can be said in many ways, e.g.:

Nothing beats first-hand experience.

There is nothing better than first-hand experience.

Nothing can take the place of first-hand experience.

The two examples that you provide are acceptable, although I personally would not express your intended message in those words. The phrases 'could be better' and 'can be better' imply the possibility (perhaps even the probability) that one thing can/could be better than another. However, I interpret your intended meaning to be that 'first-hand experience' is always better than any other type of experience. If my interpretation is correct, then it might be better to replace 'could be better/can be better' with 'is better'. The use of 'is better' does not simply imply the possibility of a better outcome; it states it as an absolute certainty.

  • As for my examples, are they both correct or something? – John Arvin Dec 14 '18 at 18:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.