I learned that clad can mean dressed, but I'm not sure the exact usage of it.

Normally I used to say

1. An old man, dressed up in old clothing, is standing there.
2. He dressed up well/neat
3. He dressed up in old clothing.

Can I use "clad" in all these sentences instead of "dressed up" like below?

1. An old man, clad in old clothing, is standing there.
2. He clad well/neat
3. He clad in old clothing.

I don't think clad fits well in all of these sentences. May be it fits well only in the first sentence. It doesn't fit in 2nd and 3rd sentences I guess. Am I correct?

  • You are correct. They might work with "is clad", though. – Tyler James Young Mar 12 '14 at 2:34
  • @TylerJamesYoung You mean "He is clad well" works? – T2E Mar 12 '14 at 2:42
  • 1
    @T2E You are correct, only the first of your three examples works. Why that's the case fabulously represents just how convoluted this language really is. I'm hoping somebody comes along and explains it soon, because I kind of know, and it's making my head spin. In order to properly address it, I'd have to look up several terms I haven't used in 30 years. – Jolenealaska Mar 12 '14 at 2:59
  • It's not something I'd say, but it seems grammatically valid. Conversely, this is the only place on the whole internet where "he clad well" appears without some kind of "is" verb. – Tyler James Young Mar 12 '14 at 3:06
  • 1
    @T2E "He is clad well" is grammatically correct, but sounds terrible. – Jolenealaska Mar 12 '14 at 3:07

Clad is a fossil, an archaic past and past participle form of the verb clothe, now generally replaced by clothed, and having the same sense.

Unlike dress, which may be used both transitively and intransitively, clothe may be used only as transitive verb: it requires a direct object, the person who is clothed.

Consequently, your first example, “an old man clad in old clothing”, is grammatical—here clad is the past participle, employed as an adjective. But your other examples are not grammatical. You must provide a direct object:

He clad himself well/neatly.
He clad himself in old clothing.

Clad as a participle is a strictly literary form. It is almost never heard in conversation, and is old-fashioned even in writing.

Clad as a finite verb is distinctly archaic; it should be used only if you are trying to sound mediaeval.

I advise you not to use either; use clothed instead, in formal contexts, or dressed in either formal or informal contexts.

Do not, however, use dress up as you do in your examples. This is used in only two senses:

To dress in more formal attire than usual: She always dresses up to go to the theatre.
With as, to disguise oneself in clothing: She dressed up as a Klingon for the costume party.

Since the matter has been raised in the comments, I may mention that clad, as both participle and finite verb, is much more widely known than it is used because it is a very popular word among historical novelists and writers of fantasy. For instance, the folk hero Robin Hood and his Merry Men are almost inevitably described as “clad in Kendal green”. (Not one reader in twenty knows what Kendal green is, but it doesn’t matter.)

  • Woo-Hoo! How did I know it was going to be you?!? +1 BTW, Kendall is a family first name :) – Jolenealaska Mar 12 '14 at 5:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.