2

There's a sentence like:

I ____ television at 7pm last night.
a) was watching
b) watched
c) watch

Can we use a) and b) to complete the sentence?

Some friends here said a) because there's 7pm to indicate what was happening. And others said b) because there last night there, and I am in a group who choosed a) and b) as it depends on what is intended by a writer (depends on situation / action / question are given).

  • Hey, that's a great question! I've edited it because it contained small formatting mistakes. You can see the changes I made if you click on the link right above my username where it says "edited ...some time ago". If you have a few minutes, you can read this post (read the whole thing, and specifically the last few paragraphs), which explains how to format your posts so that they look nice and exactly how you intend them to. – userr2684291 Dec 29 '18 at 16:38
1

Both of your friends are right, because it depends on the context.

First we have to understand why you would want to say this. The most common context would be in response to a question, phrased in the progressive because the person asking the question is thinking of some event that was happening at the same time.

A: What were you doing at 7pm last night?

Your answer should also be in the progressive:

B: I was watching television at 7pm. Why?

The related event could be explained using the simple past:

A: Because I texted you at 7pm to see if you wanted to meet us at the pub, and you didn't respond.

Or, if it was an ongoing event, the progressive:

A: Because everyone was having drinks at the pub at that time, and I texted to see if you wanted to meet us.


Although it's grammatical, it's a little strange to just say "I watched TV at 7pm last night". It's hard to think of a situation where the simple past makes sense, because watching television is an ongoing activity, that you were doing for some period of time around 7pm.

I suppose we could use our imagination -- for example, suppose you are being questioned by the police:

Police: Now sir, what did you do last night around 7pm?
You: I watched TV at 7pm last night.
Police: And how do you know the exact time?
You: Because my favorite show comes on at 7pm. I always watch TV at 7pm, every night.

Because the police officer's question is phrased in the simple past, you might choose to respond with the simple past. You don't have to -- you could rephrase to the progressive if that makes more sense for an ongoing activity, especially in relation to some other event.

Police: Now sir, what did you do last night around 7pm?
You: I was watching TV from 6 to 9 last night, so I couldn't have been robbing that bank.


Again, this is more about the idiomatic way people say things in English, rather than simple grammar. It might be different with a different verb. For example, if you were talking about something that was not an ongoing event:

I ate dinner at 7pm last night

Obviously you didn't eat your entire dinner in that moment, but it's idiomatic for English speakers to talk about when a meal begins rather than how long it takes. You could use the progressive if you wanted to relate it to another event at the same time:

I was eating dinner at 7pm last night, so I couldn't have been robbing that bank.

  • Thank you, your explanation is very clear. So we can't say here someone was wrong with the options on top due to the sentence depends on the context. But, because of ongoing activities ( watch TV ),; we can use past continuous if it relates to other activities. It based on imagination although on the text we couldn't find any other activities that related to. – Ira Maya Dec 30 '18 at 0:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.