2

I heard in the movie Scarface:

You can't stand for another man to be touching me.

Do people say stand for someone to do something?

Also I am not clear on the difference between stand and stand for, as both can mean tolerate or endure. What is the difference between stand and stand for in this particular sense?

I can't stand the way Mom talks to him"

I wouldn't stand for that sort of behavior from him, if I were you.

  • I feel your first example should not be read as: [can't stand for] another man to be touching me. It should read as: [can't stand] [for another man to be touching me.] in my opinion. It's not demonstrating the usage of "can't stand for", but "can't stand". But I might be wrong, so it's just an FYI. – dan Dec 31 '18 at 1:33
  • @dan You are absolutely right. It is actually a different question from the second half of my post. I only put it there because the two parts are related. – Eddie Kal Dec 31 '18 at 1:39
  • Remember that scriptwriters intentionally give their characters poor language skills, dialects and accents. Do a google search for Sopranos Malapropisms, they're great! – Matt Dec 31 '18 at 8:33
2

Good examples of these two phrases getting mixed up.

I can't stand (something) means I intensely dislike something.

I wouldn't stand for that - means I wouldn't accept the way you've been treated, and I'd do something about it.

You can say: I can't stand porridge.

You can't say: I wouldn't stand for porridge.

  • Of course you can say I wouldn't stand for porridge. You just need the right context. For instance, when talking to a recruitment officer for Quaker Oats: "You might stand for porridge, but I won't. Look for someone else." It's perfectly fine in that context. It means that you won't represent it. (Which is a meaning that you didn't include in your answer.) In fact, the other meaning you gave also makes sense. Such as being served porridge at a 3-star restaurant. That's not something I'd stand for. – Jason Bassford Dec 30 '18 at 22:21
  • Fair enough Jason. However, I'd prefer to say I wouldn't stand for being given porridge. It's not the porridge you find offensive, it's that fact someone insulted you with such a lowly breakfast. Not sure I'd go along with the first argument with that poor Quaker though! They're hardly the offensive sort, after all. I do get the point of I hate everything that (Nigel Farage?) stands for ;-) – Matt Dec 30 '18 at 23:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.