I'm confused whether I should be saying:

  1. He's in Japan.
  2. He's at Japan.

They both sound alright to me but I'm wondering which one is more grammatically correct.


Only say "he's in Japan". We use 'at' for very local placement - he's at my house; she's at the front of the bus. We use 'in' for countries, cities, areas, etc. He's in Japan; he's in Tokyo; we're in London.

At, on or in a place (Cambridge Dictionary)

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.