I was asked to fill the blank below preseving the meaning of the sentence.

It was not necessary for him to take any warm clothes, so he travelled light. He ________________________ take any warm clothes with him, so he travelled light.

I wrote "He hadn't needed to" what was wrong as "He didn't need to" turned out to be correct.

I used the past perfect, as I imagined it like so: PAST: he travelled; EARLIER PAST: he hadn't needed

In similar topic I've found this:

You can 'know' something at any time. You can realise something long after becoming aware of it, as 'knowing' requires a conscious thought to realise it. You can only 'notice' something when you're present, there and then, to be able to notice it.

I guess there is a similar case with "need" and "travel"? If so, is there wider explanation how to move comfortably between those verbs like "know, need" and "notice, travel" in past tenses? This is very confusing when your native language has one past tense.


"Need" is a stative verb not an active verb. In this case there is no duration, it is just not necessary to take warm clothes. Like you know something or you don't (meaning having knowledge of), which is different from "I have known him for years".

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.