Do you know what are elves and dwarfs? They are fictional species for fantasy stories.

I was wondering if words like swordman, manpower, policeman, spearman, etc (everything with man) could be replaced with swordelf, dwarfpower, policedwarf, spearelf, etc Can I replace the part "man" with another?

In case of yes, about elves, would be ...elf or ...elve?

  • You could just use the original words. "Tanis Half-Elven was a master swordsman" makes perfect sense. And presumably male elves and dwarves just think of themselves as "men", the generic term for a person in those words. (You should decide the name for our species in a story, is it Men like in Tolkein, or Humans, or...) Also what about creatures like dragons? Is dragonpower a required quantity of dragons, or more analogous to horsepower? Commented Feb 15 at 20:40

3 Answers 3


You can, but in my opinion they don't really "work," except for a few cases. The most common substitution you'll see is changing mankind into whatever other species. I don't think I've seen variations of manpower or swordsman. I think fantasy authors just use different words, like using warrior instead of swordsman.

  • 1
    I agree, and would note that we continue to use "horsepower" when referring to engines, even though the power is no longer provided by horses.
    – Katy
    Commented Feb 8, 2019 at 19:47
  • 3
    +1 Tolkien uses "gentlehobbit"; but that's by way of nudging the basic joke that the hobbits are quintessentially English. Commented Feb 8, 2019 at 19:56
  • 2
    I'm pretty sure "swordswoman" is well-attested, but that's not quite the question.
    – SamBC
    Commented Feb 8, 2019 at 20:08
  • 1
    Swordsman would become sword fighter and manpower would become human labour (or just labour if you want to be species agnostic). Commented Feb 9, 2019 at 2:36
  • @StoneyB Good example! I was trying to remember how Tolkien handled this issue. Commented Feb 9, 2019 at 22:06

You would be coining a term, albeit in a perfectly logical way. Everyone would know what you meant, but I personally wouldn't do it unless you're aiming for humour. It would be very hard to do without coming off as at least a little flippant.

  • 1
    I agree that it comes across as only appropriate for humor. I could imagine an author like Terry Pratchett doing it, but it wouldn't work in a more serious work of fantasy. Commented Feb 8, 2019 at 21:51

Not really - you would be inventing new words if you did that. Some people might find it sexist to use "man" rather than something more gender-neutral like "person", but "personpower", "swordperson", etc. are not standard English. If you replaced "man" with something else the meaning would probably be understood, but again, it would sound like a made-up word.

EDIT to add: I think it might work better if you hyphenated the words, e.g. "police-elf" or "dwarf-power" - this might be more "acceptable" English.

And to answer your other question, the singular of "elves" is "elf". The plural of "dwarf" is either "dwarfs" or "dwarves".

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .