0

But plenty have come to him when they haven't been able to heal through traditional means.

As far as I know, past simple or past perfect are tend to be used with "when", because they are more specific. Why there is "have come" instead of "But plenty came to him when..."?

Does it work similarly to present simple, but for the past?

But plenty come to him when they are not able to heal through traditional means.

So, here it still happens, people still visit him when they need.

In the first example it was the case - people have come to him. It could last weeks, months, years - we don't know, and we don't know if they still come?

1
  • Please try and remember this: you can use any tense, just about. It's tend, not "are tend".
    – Lambie
    Sep 26 at 22:17

2 Answers 2

0

Why there is "have come" instead of "But plenty came to him when..."?

"Have come" is the present perfect, and it refers to recent past and/or ongoing events in the present also. Why not use the present perfect? Each tense has a meaning, which could conceivably be applied to a situation.

But plenty came to him when they weren't able to heal through traditional means.

That's fine, in the past tense.

But plenty come to him when they are not able to heal through traditional means.

The problem with present tense is when you consider "plenty come to him". In order to know verifiably that it's "plenty", we must have observed it already happen. Thus, in the past or recent past. Not literally in the present. Therefore, one of the past-related tenses (present perfect, past perfect, past) could be a good choice. However, you may still use the simple present tense, it's not ungrammatical.

As far as I know, past simple or past perfect are tend to be used with "when", because they are more specific.

Fascinating. Sometimes this is true. As an exercise for the reader, take a sentence with "when" and switch it to the present perfect. Occasionally, the word "when" switches to "whenever" or "every time". The difficulty with "whenever" or "every time" in the original example, is that "when they haven't been able to heal" is a somewhat unique and one-time event. So, "whenever" or "every time" would be transitioned back to "when", indicating it probably only happened once, or at least very infrequently.

1
  • "Plenty come..." seems more appropriate to make a general statement that's true both in the past and in the present than "plenty have come" (which feels more past-focused). Jul 27, 2020 at 16:33
0

TYHe use of the perfect presents the sequence of events (people coming to him) as a continuing sequence. A simple past would imply that this has now stopped happening.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .