1

To me, the first sentence seems to mean the vase was sold at an auction whreas the second sentence was sold at a store.

As a non-native speaker, it's so confusing which preposition is more appropriate for the price.

Also, I think the second sentence more likely to be used than the first one.

Am I right? Is there any subtle difference between these two?

4

The vase was sold at $300.

This is typical use at an auction, where the actual selling price is determined by the competing bidders. It is normal to use at here to emphasize that, from a spectrum of possible prices, this is the price at which the item sold.

The vase was sold for $300.

This is the most common use, and is typical in non-auction settings, where the seller sets a price. Even if the list price was $350 and some negotiation was done, it is normal to say that it sold for a price.

Note that these uses are not exclusive; one could use either one in either situation, but these are the more common uses.

  • Agreed, although instead of spectrum I would say it's the mark at which the object was sold, since (normally) auction prices only go up. – Andrew Feb 15 at 15:29
  • There is a range of possible prices, from the minimum bid to (theoretically) infinity. That the bids only increase does not change this, although each bid reduces the remaining options. – Davo Feb 15 at 15:45
  • Sure, and it's a minor distinction that I only mention because when we use the word "spectrum" we say where someone "falls on that spectrum" -- which is to say there is no directional component. It may be easier to visualize an auction as a rising value that stops at the point where no one wants to bid any higher. – Andrew Feb 15 at 17:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.