0

This is a description (I made it up myself).

So 4 people are running away from wolves. They reach the end of the cliff.

Can I use:

They couldn't go ahead.

Or:

There was no way ahead.

And if one of them exclaims:

Here is no way ahead.

Is the use of "ahead" natural? Does it mean that they can't "go any further"?

1

"Ahead" sounds a little bit unnatural. You would be more likely to hear one of the following:

There was no way forward.

They could go no further.

They couldn't go on.

As an exclamation, someone might shout:

We can't go forward!

There's nowhere to go!

Depending on the circumstances, someone might add:

We have to turn back!

0

You can use "they couldn't go ahead" or "there was no way ahead".

They both sound pretty natural to me, although I have to say "they couldn't go any further" sounds more natural to me. But I can't give you a reason why.

The phrase "here is no way ahead" is definitely not natural, although perhaps you mean "there is no way ahead".

On a separate note, most people would say "edge of a cliff" not "end of a cliff".

  • What I meant: We can't go ahead. @fred2. – It's about English Feb 19 at 6:35
  • "But I can't give you a reason why." I will try to help. Standalone, the sentences are a little awkward, because something is missing. But they sound just right if you imagine a scream prior to those sentences: "Don't stop! Go ahead! The wolves are getting closer!" - My "scream" is not perfect, I am aware, but it should help get the idea. Now you know why you never read a book written by me :D – virolino Feb 19 at 6:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.