I learned that in relative clauses, the relative pronoun acts as a subject or an object or a complement.

Red is the color which we painted the wall.

Is this sentence grammatical?
Paint is a verb that should be followed by a object and a complement, so I think red act as a complement in this relative clause, therefore the sentence should make sense. Is that right?

The teacher doesn't like the student whom we elected class president.

Elected is a verb that should be followed by two objects, so in this clause, even though we have one object class president already, one object is still missing , and whom represents the missing object, is that right?

This is a lesson which the students are eager to learn.

I am slightly confused with this one, inside the relative clause
Subject : the students , verb : are , complement(adj) : eager
to learn acts as an adverb to modfiy the complement(adj) eager,
so the clause itself seems complete already, so what does the relative pronoun which represents here ?


Which points to the complement (more precisely, the direct object) of to learn: The students are eager to learn [this lesson]. To learn [this lesson] is the complement of the adjective eager.

(Yes, adjectives have complements too!)

Here's a tree diagram which illustrates the complexity of the structure:

enter image description here

Which refers backward to a lesson and forward to the missing object of learn. Students is the implicit subject of the infinitival clause which is the complement of the adjective eager.

  • Thanks, I didn't know adjective have complements too, I used to think it should be an adverb. And for the first and second sentence, are my knowledge correct? – Kathy Feb 19 '19 at 16:32
  • @Kathy Yes, your first two parses are correct, except that technically class president is an object complement rather than an object. – StoneyB on hiatus Feb 19 '19 at 17:00
  • So inside the complement “to learn this lesson” there is another complement, which is “ this lesson”, then the clause sentence structure would go like S+V+C+C+C, is that legit ? – Kathy Feb 20 '19 at 1:01
  • 1
    @Kathy It's a bit more complicated than that. I've added a diagram from Miles Shang's website, based on this bracketed notation: [CLAUSE [SUBJECT [np This]] [PREDICATE [v is] [COMPLEMENT [np [^dp a lesson<a>] [RELATIVECLAUSE [RELATIVIZER_a which][CLAUSE [SUBJECT [np students<b>][PREDICATE [v are][COMPLEMENT [ap [adj eager][COMPLEMENT [INFINITIVALCLAUSE [SUBJECT_b (__)] [PREDICATE [^v to learn][OBJECT [np ___ <a>]]]]]]]]]] – StoneyB on hiatus Feb 20 '19 at 15:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.