I was solving an astronomy problem which said "south of due west." This could be interpreted in two different ways and I don't know which one is correct. Is 'south of' in that phrase an idiom? Or does it mean southwest?

Here is the full sentence:

The Sun rises north of due east and sets south of due west.

And the question is:

Which statement best describes the position of the Sun at sunrise and sunset as seen by an observer in northern hemisphere on June 21?

A. The Sun rises north of due east and sets north of due west.
B. The Sun rises south of due east and sets south of due west.
C. The Sun rises north of due east and sets south of due west.
D. The Sun rises south of due east and sets north of due west.
E. The Sun rises due east and sets due west.


5 Answers 5


Look at a compass rose.

enter image description here

Look at W for west. Now move 'southwards', which is anticlockwise1 in this case, from the point for west. Somewhere in that region is "south of due west". You would expect it to be no nearer south than it is to west, as that would be "west of due south". Conventions vary, but I would tend to interpret "south of due west" WSW, or west-south-west, which is actually due west of south west. It might mean south-west, of course, or if you use a traditional mariner's compass (the compass rose of which has another degree of subdivision, for a total of 32 points), it might mean "west by south" (WbS), the point between W and WSW. Unless you have a clear idea of what the conventions of the text are, it could be any point anticlockwise of west and not anticlockwise of south-west.

1: In this case it is anticlockwise; 'southwards' from east would be clockwise.

  • 2
    Yes. Those 32 divisions are the "points". 3 points south of due west would be south-west by south. They later added half-points, so you could say "half a point west of south-west", and eventually quarter-points, giving 128 directions on the compass. I don't know if they've switched to using degrees nowadays; I know less about modern sailing than 19th century and earlier sailing.
    – SamBC
    Commented Feb 22, 2019 at 13:10
  • 1
    You may find figure 39 in this link illuminating, perhaps the whole thing... : zapatopi.net/kelvin/papers/…
    – Solar Mike
    Commented Feb 22, 2019 at 13:13
  • 2
    I'd interpret this as WbS (West by South ), i.e. 1/32 of a full circle anticlockwise from due west. This is (centred at) 258.75°. So if you're using a compass in degrees, ⪅ 260°. Or in practice start looking due west and shift a few degrees left, as it's easiest to find things if you know which side you're scanning from.
    – Chris H
    Commented Feb 22, 2019 at 16:20
  • 1
    It's worth mentioning that this is a colloquialism that would rarely be interpreted as "SW" or even "WSW," but some indeterminate but small southerly diversion from due west.
    – JBH
    Commented Feb 23, 2019 at 16:56
  • 1
    @SamBC: For the simple reason that when you're laying on the ground, looking up at the sky, west is on your right and east is on your left. see heavens-above.com/… for example. Commented Feb 23, 2019 at 17:25

Although it could technically be anywhere between W and S, I would interpret that as being significantly closer to W than S. Probably somewhere between W and WSW.

  • Depending on the latitude, it can really be anywhere between W and S. Commented Feb 25, 2019 at 20:58

Because it's in an astronomy context, there is a possible reason for this wording over "west-south-west" or "southwest". This could be not just a location, but directions on how to find it. Instead of trying to give a more precise compass direction, the phrase implies that you locate the celestial body in question by first looking due west, then slowly rotating your gaze/binoculars/telescope southwards until you come to the first body that matches the description of the body you're looking for.

So one might write "Betelgeuse is a red star that sets at 9:08 pm local time, South of due West." The intention is if a reader of that sentence wants to find Betelgeuse in the sky, they would go outside on a clear night at about 8:45 pm, locate due West, look in that direction and then start scanning to the South (left) of that point for a red star.

It's actually more helpful to locate stars by intentionally missing to one side and then knowing to look to the left or right of a compass point than it is to try to point at it directly. If you are trying to locate Betelgeuse (for example) by just pointing directly at it, and you don't see it, you don't know whether to scan left or right for it. If you deliberately start off at a point definitely to the right or left of what you're looking for, you always know which direction to scan in. Also, if you don't see it in your scan, you can go back to your reference point and start scanning outwards again, knowing that there's essentially "half the sky" you can ignore.

The same technique is used in some kinds of navigation/orienteering, and I remember seeing a question about that on the Outdoors Stack Exchange.

  • 4
    As far as I can tell, no star will ever rise "south of due west". ISS might, though. Commented Feb 23, 2019 at 13:50
  • Yes, stars rise in the East. So do the Sun moon and planets. Commented Feb 23, 2019 at 22:11

A more precise expression would be something like "10° south of due west", which would be a heading of 260° (with 0° being due north, 90° due east, 180° due south, and 270° being due west). The less specific "(slightly) south of due west" would indicate a heading just slightly less than 270°, so essentially in a western direction, but a bit south-ish ...

  • 1
    Since this is astronomy, it would be a bearing, not a heading. Heading is the direction in which something is moving.
    – prl
    Commented Feb 23, 2019 at 20:12

This answer might belong here but a bit of astronomy is required in order to answer the question correctly.

Which statement best describes the position of the Sun at sunrise and sunset as seen by an observer in northern hemisphere on June 21?

It really depends on the latitude of the observer:

  • In New York City, the sun will rise at an azimuth of 57.5°, which is between north-east and east-north-east.
  • In Bogotá, the sun will rise at 66.5°, which is close to east-north-east.
  • In Reykjavik, the sun will rise at 19°, which is between north and north-north-east.

Replying "east" or "north-east" would be wrong for a majority of the observers in the northern hemisphere. What those positions have in common though, is that they are "north of due east", meaning that they're somewhere between north and east, but not necessarily north-east. It also means that it's probable that the exact position is closer to east than to north.

The correct answer is A.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .