2

Necessary Employees and Persons Authorized

Does it mean "(necessary employees) and (persons authorized)" or "necessary (employees and persons) who are authorized"?

0

"authorized" is not an adjective as much as it is a participle. If it were a full sentence, it would have read:

Necessary Employees and Persons Are Authorized

  • Then does "authorized" and "necessary" apply to both "employee" and "person"? – jay Mar 4 at 6:49
  • Yes. You can read it simplified: "Necessary Personnel Authorized" – virolino Mar 4 at 6:53
0

It is ambiguous, but given the specific context, it would be more common for it to be treated as two things:

  1. Necessary employees.
  2. Persons authorized.

Part of the problem is the order of the words in the second phrase. More commonly, authorized would come before Persons:

  1. Necessary employees.
  2. Authorized persons.

In which case, the full version of the sentence would be more understandable:

Necessary Employees and Authorized Persons


In the original version of the sentence, by having put Authorized at the end of the sentence you are creating the possibility that it applies to either just Persons (which is typical) or to Employees and Persons. But note that if Authorized applies to both, then it would also be possible for Necessary to apply to both.


If you really do want to have both modifiers apply to both nouns, then you would likely write it differently:

Necessary and Authorized Employees and Persons

This makes it clearer that the combination of two nouns is being modified by a combination of the two adjectives.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.