0

Let’s start with an example. Does the title of the chapter „The Vanishing Glass” of „Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone” mean that a vanishing glass will appear in the chapter and the title is about that vanishing glass? As we know from the book it is the case, but is it a rule? What would „A Vanishing Glass” or „Vanishing Glass” in the title of a chapter of a book mean? What could we predict by that?

The same case with titles of books. Does „the Chamber of Secrets” in the title of the second part of the series mean that the book is about that one chamber from the title? Again, what would „Chamber of Secrets” or „A Chamber of Secrets” mean?

Finally, what did J. R. R. Tolkien want to tell by putting „the” in „the Lord of the Rings”? Did he mean a specific person?

  • 1
    There have been vote(s) to close this for being "primarily opinion-based". I don't think that's a judicious opinion. Why is "the" so commonly used in titles, and what does it mean in the kinds of examples cited? Why is this more opinion-based than any other question about English? – Jim Reynolds Mar 8 at 8:06
  • The choice of a|an OR plural OR the OR the null set question is a grammar question and not opinion based. Each has a specific meaning. And it does not matter whether it is a title or not, actually. – Lambie Mar 8 at 15:00
3

In the sense you are talking about here, articles in chapter titles mean exactly the same thing as articles anywhere else. "A" means a non-specific instance of a thing, while "the" means a specific instance.

I haven't read the Harry Potter books, but if one is title "The Chamber of Secrets", I would take that to mean that there is one particular chamber that this book is talking about. If there were many such chambers and this book was only about one of them, then the title would have been, "A Chamber of Secrets".

Bear in mind that "the" can be used when there are many instances of a thing in the world, but we are talking about one particular example that we have identified. We often see a shift from "a" to "the" in a single paragraph or even a single sentence because of this. Like, "I saw a car in the street. The car was parked by the mailbox." In the first sentence, we use "a" because it is one of many cars that exist in the world and we have not yet narrowed the range of our discussion. But once I refer to that car in the first sentence, now there is one particular car under discussion, so the second sentence uses "the".

One way that titles are different from ordinary writing is that they often leave out words. A newspaper headline might well say something like, "Car Accident on Third" rather than a complete sentence like "There was a car accident on Third Street." So "Chamber of Secrets" would be an equally likely and valid title as "The Chamber of Secrets".

Likewise, because it is abbreviated like this, a title might use "the" when the context has not been established, and we would use "a" in a complete sentence. Like you might see a title like, "The Man in the Black Hat". While presumably there are many men with black hats in the world so we wouldn't begin a conversation by referring to "the" such man. But for a title, we're leaving things out. In this case, the context of which man we're talking about. So if a title uses "the", that might be intended to indicate that there is only one instance of whatever in the world, or it might mean that when you read the book (or see the movie or whatever), which one it's talking about will become clear.

  • Thank you for the answer. Especially the last paragraph was useful as I keep seeing the pattern in headlines and I have been explaining it to myself the same way. – piter00 Mar 7 at 18:09
  • I have just noticed that in "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows" there is a chapter "A Place to Hide". In this chapter a group of friends look for a place to hide which they finally find. Could you comment this? As I understand it, the title tells about the search, not about the place they find? The full version of the title would be "a group of friends look for a place to hide" Am I right? – piter00 Mar 7 at 19:08
  • @piter00 Again, I haven't read the book, but just based on that chapter title: There are probably many places that they could have hidden. There wasn't just one possible place to hide. So it's "a place", not "the place". It's also crucial that it says "to hide" rather than "where they hid". If the title was "A Place Where We Hid", I'd take that to mean that they hid in many different places over the course of time and this chapter is about one particular such place. But "A Place to Hide" doesn't mean they actually hid in many different places, just that there ... – Jay Mar 7 at 21:01
  • ... were many possible places where they could have hidden. RE your "full version": Yes, something like that. Without reading the chapter, it might be more correct to say ".. find a place to hide" or "... need a place to hide but never find one" or other possible variations. But what you suggest is along the right lines. – Jay Mar 7 at 21:03
  • I find it a good explanation as far as it goes. I'd just add that the distinction between the two choices (as well as a third one, which is the zero article, and a fourth, which is no article, because for example, there's another determiner introducing the noun phrase. I think it's useful to add that the lines between a definiteness and indefiniteness are often blurry or defy explanation, at least simple explanation. Example: A says "Where's Susan?" B replies, "She's out looking for a man." B might mean a specific man or any of many possible men. This is meant as an addition, not a criticism. – Jim Reynolds Mar 8 at 8:43
0

I'm sorry, but rather like Humpty-Dumpty, chapter titles mean exactly what the author intended them to mean, no more, no less.

Much like the books themselves, sometimes they are for entertainment, and sometimes factual.

0

Titles with the refer to specific things.

The Vanishing Stone is about a stone the author is writing about. That one, not another one.

An author would be hard pressed to write a title like this:

A Vanishing Stone unless he means a random stone he chanced upon and is writing about what that means. or Vanishing Stone which implies a subject area and vanishing as adjective:

Vanishing stone is frequently found in the desert. [There is no such thing, by the way]

The Bird at my House [a specific bird I have at my house] A Bird at my House [a random bird that showed up at my house]

There is no difference between these usages in sentences and in titles:

  • I saw a boy on the street. [sentence] Title: A Boy on the Street
  • I saw the boy on the street. [sentence] Title: The Boy on the Street
  • I saw boys on the street. [sentence] Title: Boys on the Street
  • Not a very satisfying explanation for the use of the vs a, in my opinion. Is not, following a simple logic, A Tale of Two Cities a specific tale? Is the song A Woman in Love about a "random" woman, while Goldilocks and the Three Bears are about "specific" bears? If so, which ones? I predict most will say, "The ones in the story with Goldilocks". But if so, why not "The woman who's speaking through the song"? This is not to denigrate your answer. It's a common one. Just a note that it's actually a rather elusive distinction. Experts (linguists) still trade arguments about it. – Jim Reynolds Mar 8 at 8:31
  • @Jim No, "A Tale of Two Cities" is not specific grammatically speaking. He tells a tale of two cities, he could have told a tale of two empires, or "The Tale of Paris and London" or "A Tale of Paris and London". Yes, "A Woman in Love" is actually a generic idea, some woman or other. "The Cat in the Hat" is specific,that specific cat*. And often, the s or irregular plural is generic too: A Man of Distinction (an actual book) can be contrasted grammatically with: Men of Distinction. All general ideas. – Lambie Mar 8 at 14:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.