Who knows exactly the difference between objective and object?
For instance:
The government whose object/objective is the good of people...
Add a comment
|
In a broader sense, an object is a visible entity. But both those words, object and objective have a common meaning referring to:
The goal intended to be attained (and which is believed to be attainable)
Various other words which can be used are aim and target. Therefore, all the following have the same meaning:
- The government whose objective is the good of people.
- The government whose object is the good of people.
- The government whose aim is the good of people.
- The government whose target is the good of people.
answered Mar 28 '14 at 12:28
-
-
-
I think I agree that "object" and "objective" are both good. However, I somehow feel that "The government whose object is the good of people" sounds better. Perhaps it's because "object" sounds a bit more poetic and archaic, and "the good of people" is abstract enough. Mar 28 '14 at 13:20
-
I do not think so. In my opinion, they are never synonym, above all, as such my original question.– nimaMar 28 '14 at 13:46
Grammatically, object would refer to the recipient of an action and an objective may be a complement of the object.
The electorate elected him president.
There are other words as well like " select" which is different from "selective"- select means of special class / carefully chosen as being the best or most suitable. Similarly removal of suffix "-ive" makes something special like Object stands for not purpose but ultimate purpose
-
1
I would say it's very slight in the usage, One of Purpose vs a goal.
The object of the government - the Purpose of government The objective of the government - the goal of the government
In the one since it is their reason for being, in the other it is potentially one of many desired end states, or temporary goals along a path to a particular end state.
Also I would suggest that form or use of "The object of the government.." is becoming antiquated or archaic.
