2

If I used to work in a company, which one of the sentences given below is correct when I am telling someone about this experience:

(1) I have worked in this company before; or

(2) I had worked in this company before.

I was taught that it's fine to use 'have + p.p.' as a way of description when we are talking about our experience. However, I was also taught that if the thing we are talking about has been done/over in the past, we should use 'had + p.p.' instead. Therefore, I was wondering which one is correct or are these two sentences both available for this context?

2

This question has been answered multiple times on ELL but I think I may have found a very simple answer:

(1) I have worked at/for this company before; [would be said in a present time and merely informs us that this is a past event, that is true when you are speaking,but does not provide a time such as last year.]

(2) I had worked at/for this company before. [would be said in the present time about something which occurred before something else in the past.]

I had worked at XYZ company before, after I worked at ABC company.

worked = in the past

had worked = before that. It precedes the simple past activity.

Your choice will depend on your overall context and what you wish to emphasize or say. It is not a grammar issue since both are fine.

  • @Lambie: Should it be "I had worked at XYZ company before, before I worked at ABC company."? And maybe get rid of one "before"? – virolino Mar 25 at 10:20
0
  1. "Yes. I have worked at this company before." The sentence is only about whether I've worked here before.
  2. "I had worked at this company before I was shipped overseas with the Army." The sentence mentions that I've worked here but only as a frame of reference to leaving with the Army.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.