She overcame all of her difficulties and created her own destiny as a merchant all by herself. That is not all. After making a large fortune, she willingly donated almost all of her wealth to her starving neighbors. I really respect her way of life.

Here, if i use was instead of is, the focus of the thing verb indicates would be changed?

  • I wouldn't see any real difference between them. "That" refers to the previous statement either way. – nasch Apr 1 '19 at 3:08

1) That is not all. [as I tell the story now]

That implies that there is more to the story you are telling.

2) That was not all. [that happened to the lady]

That implies that more happened in the story you are telling.

So, it depends on how you want to express yourself. Both are right.

[please note: created her own destiny as a merchant is a bit much. Perhaps shopkeeper is better. And "created a future for herself as a shop owner"/


We use "that is" to give an example or a clarifying comment.

The word "that" is a dummy subject. It refers, in some way, to the current text or "What I am saying" (or similar) and so uses the present tense.

So could be understood as

She overcame her difficulties all by herself... What I have said is not all I could say...

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.