2

Can anyone rewrite this phrase in an easier fashion, so I can understand it:

The last function of reason is to recognize that there is an infinity of things which are beyond it. It is but feeble if it does not see so far as to know this.

—Blaise Pascal

closed as off-topic by James K, Nathan Tuggy, SamBC, virolino, choster Apr 8 at 17:36

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave these specific reasons:

  • "Questions asking for someone to find and correct errors or improve the phrasing are considered requests for proofreading and are off-topic. Please edit your question to focus on something in particular that you are unsure about; if that's not possible, see websites for proofreading instead." – James K, SamBC, choster
  • "This question should include more details than have been provided here. Please edit to add the research you have done in your efforts to answer the question, or provide more context. See: Details, Please." – Nathan Tuggy, virolino
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • Could you explain what you do not understand? – Lambie Apr 1 at 16:45
  • the second sentence is the more difficult one and I don't get it: "It is but feeble if it does not see so far as to know this." – Daruis soli Apr 1 at 16:47
  • "Reason is only feeble if reason does not see far enough to understand this". But here = only. An old usage. – Lambie Apr 1 at 16:50
  • what about does not see far enough? it's a metaphor or what? – Daruis soli Apr 1 at 16:54
  • I think it would mean the same thing in your language. Reason cannot see far enough. yes, reason is like a person. – Lambie Apr 1 at 17:00
1

The last part,

It is but feeble if it does not see so far as to know this.

could be rephrased as:

Reason is weak if it not does realize that there is an infinity of things which are beyond it.


By the way, if you find the original French sentence and use Google Translate, the result is easy to understand and, surprisingly, pretty accurate (you just need to change she to it).

The last step of reason is to recognize that there is an infinity of things that surpass it; [it] is only weak, if [it] does not go so far as to know that.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.