What is the difference between the following two sentences.

There was not a moment to be lost.

There was not a moment to lose.


There is no significant difference in meaning. The "to be lost" form is slightly more formal, and perhaps a bit more old-fashioned, but neither would seem odd in current speech, I think. Yet more informal would be

There was no time to lose.

This is not quite as forceful -- "not a moment" emphasizes that not even the smallest bit of time could be spared.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.