-1
  1. I saw a man in the room.
  2. I saw the man in the room.

1a. I saw a man who was in the room. There were five people in the room, for example. I saw one man who was in the room. In this case, 'in the room' can modify 'a man'.

1b. In the room, I saw a man. In this case 'in the room' modifies 'saw' in Sentence 1. So Sentence 1 also has structural ambiguity, doesn't it?

  • 1
    The way you've formatted your question is very confusing. What role does sentence 2 play? You've listed it, but you only ask about 1a and 1b. (Which you don't list.) Does sentence 2 have any purpose? Why didn't you just list 1a and 1b? – Jason Bassford Apr 13 '19 at 15:08
0

In (1), "in the room" is an adverbial adjunct of place.

In (2), "in the room" can be:

2a. an adverbial adjunct of place if it can be placed at the beginning of the sentence without any change of meaning:

  • In the room, I saw the man.

2b. a postmodifier of the noun phrase "the man" if the meaning is:

  • I saw the man who was in the room.
| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.