How would we form the superlative of the adjective common?

I thought it was most common, but my spelling checker recognizes commonest too.


I had the same question and so an upvote :)

This is how software tools are designed including MS Word. Don't worry, commonest is the word and many dictionaries define it.

commonest (adj) - Occurring, found, or done often; prevalent.

However, if you find it on Ngram, most common is more popular than commonest especially in recent years.

However, interesting point is, many people prefer speaking most common over commonest because if you say commonest problem it may sound communist problem! To avoid such ambiguity with such noun, prefer using most common.

  • 1
    That's a good point. I had never thought of it that way, but it could be easily misunderstood. – Jolenealaska Apr 4 '14 at 13:50
  • 1
    I like the Ngram. Very interesting. My theory would be that commonest is often avoided simply because other superlatives are also discouraged - like funnest – but who knows? – J.R. Apr 4 '14 at 23:18

There are two systems for the forms of comparisons of adjectives: One-syllable adjectives such as long have long, longer, longest. Adjectives with three and more syllables such as curious have curious, more curious, most curious. For two-syllable adjectives there is no simple and rigid rule. Grammarians have listed some endings where system 1 is to be used. But, I think, people don't have this list of endings in mind. Though grammars say it is common, commoner, commonest people prefer common, more common, most common.

I don't think that the word communist has an influence in this matter. With "communist" you use different structures. Either you say: He is a communist - or you say: the communist system.

I think people prefer "more common, most common" because it is easier to speak. Say three times "commoner, commonest" then you probably feel that hasn't the right "flow", somehow the two syllables with a weak vowel at the end are against the flow of speaking.

  • 1
    By the way, this "simple and rigid rule" for one syllable and throw-or-more syllable words is as bollocks as all "simple and rigid rules" in language. For example, "apt" (off the top of my head even). – Jürgen A. Erhard Jul 2 '15 at 12:29
  • Not very competent, your comment. You should say where you see a fault in how grammars explain the two ways of forming comparison forms. – rogermue Jul 2 '15 at 12:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.