Capital expenditure of their company in the year 2001 _______ clearly below the spending in the year 2000 when they _______ about half the investments for the concept conversion.

A) used to be / had used (which I picked)

B) was / used (the correct answer)

Can anybody explain why my answer is wrong?

migrated from english.stackexchange.com Apr 23 at 13:01

This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.

  • 3
    Used to be is for situations that have changed. If I say I used to live in Paris, it means I don't live there now. The capital expenditure of the company in 2001 cannot change because it is in the past, so it has to be was. – Minty Apr 23 at 9:00

The expenditure of a company in a past year is a basic fact and there is no reason not to use was. You would use used to be of an ongoing situation. The company used to be based in London but has now moved to Manchester.

  • Yeah, "used to be" is not idiomatic in the above, but "had used" is ungrammatical. Remove the "unnecessary" (from a syntactic standpoint) words and you'd get "Capital expenditure had used clearly below the spending ..." -- clearly nonsense. – Hot Licks Apr 23 at 12:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.