English Language Learners Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for speakers of other languages learning English. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
It was vs it would have been in the context
Hello teachers! which one is correct here using "was" or " would have been", and how do they differ in the meaning if both are correct?
For example:
It was/ would have been fun of the heart attachment if the fire of love had started equally, neither you nor I would have found repose
"Would have been" is normally counterfactual, describing something that didn't happen, for an explicit or implicit reason. "Was" is past tense
It's not quite clear what your example sentence is supposed to mean, but "if the fire of love had started equally" and "would have found" implies it is counterfactual: so you need "would have been".
I'm not sure what "fun of the heart attachment" is intended to mean, perhaps "the joy of the romantic attachment" or "the joy of the affair of the heart":
Perhaps:
It would have been a joyous affair of the heart if the fire of love had started equally
But "neither you nor I would have found repose" seems a contradiction: unequal love doesn't normally make calm!
