0

I am wondering if it's grammatical to follow up a "that clause" with another "that clause".

Here's an example:

There's this rumor that has been making the round lately, namely, that you are cheating your wife.

Is the above ok even if we remove "namely"? Do we need to put a comma after "lately"? Is this a common sentence structure? What would you call such a sentence structure?

  • Minor points: it is "making-the-rounds" and "cheating on" (if referring to infidelity). – rghome May 9 '19 at 11:33
1

You don't need "namely" or commas. In this context "that" doesn't require a comma as it is a restrictive clause, which means it is not optional. You can use "which" to introduce a non-restrictive clause and in that case it will require a comma.

It is fine to use "that" more than once, but it will get a bit clumsy eventually.

There's this rumor that has been making-the-rounds lately that you are cheating on your wife.

As opposed to:

There's this rumor, which has been making-the-rounds lately, that you are cheating on your wife.

| improve this answer | |
  • I like the second option better, because stringing multiple restrictive clauses together can get hard to read. – Kevin Jul 21 '19 at 12:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.