0

Thank you for [...]. It means lot!

Thank you for [...]. It means a lot!

Can the first sentence be used instead of the second one when wanting to give the word a different value than the one in its original version (as in the case with few/a few)?

I'm aware that it can mean the meaning of the word "lot" in its structure with no-article.

Ngrams shows a less usage of it is few compared to it is a few, and it presents kind of similar plot for it is lot and it is a lot, so does that mean it exists without the preceding article?

2

The answer is this:

to mean a lot [to someone]. The idiomatic expression requires the a. It does not mean so much without the a and is also not grammatical.

And to mean a lot to someone means the same thing as to mean so much [to someone]. To mean a lot or so much are adverbs. They modify the verb to mean.

few and a few are adjectives:

Few people [not many] like this movie. A few [some] people like this movie.

A few and few usually pair up with: there are,not: it is.

You would see: There are a few people here. or: There are few people here.

  • Thank you, Lambie, for providing this nice answer! Does "It means a lot" convey the same meaning of the idiomatic expression you have provided? And what about the results in Ngram regarding the [lot/a lot]? Why did it show that plot of the existence of such a phrase? – Tasneem ZH May 11 at 16:29
  • Yes, to mean a lot is: It means a lot to me [that you responded so politely]. – Lambie May 11 at 22:23
  • It appeared that the result Ngrams showed about "it is lot" was about the name Lot since I didn't check the box of the "case sensitive" option. – Tasneem ZH May 12 at 12:50
  • @Tazneen ZH Well, that would be: It is Lot [...]. Anyway, many would disagree with me but I think whether something is idiomatic or not can only be seen in native speakers of any language. Cheers. – Lambie May 12 at 14:52
  • Lambie, yes, it should have been "...Lot", not "...lot" as such structure doesn't exist. But since I have searched about it specifically and didn't check the "case sensitive" box, Ngrams included the results of "..Lot". I didn't realize that until later after you had inserted your first reply. – Tasneem ZH May 12 at 15:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.