It looked weird, like having a garden inside your apartment.

I thought the comma was optional in cases like these. But I searched for "it looked weird, like" on Google and almost every result had a comma.

Why is this? Is the comma really optional in cases like these?

  • 1
    You said, "almost every result had a comma." That implies some didn't use a comma – so why would you think the comma wasn't optional?
    – J.R.
    May 17, 2019 at 14:50
  • 2
    The comma is "optional" but, in this case, "natural". If you were saying this sentence out loud you would naturally put a pause after weird so the listener could better understand what you were trying to say. The comma mimics this natural pause in the conversation.
    – Andrew
    May 17, 2019 at 15:03

1 Answer 1


The comma wouldn't necessarily be included in a context like...

Many top footballers can bend it like Beckham

In that example, the "comma-less" version would naturally be understood to mean Many top footballers can bend the ball the way Beckham can. But if the comma was included, it would normally be understood as Many top footballers can bend the ball. Beckham is an example of a player who can do this (more accurately, perhaps, ...an example of those top players).

It would be quirky in the extreme to omit the comma in OP's specific example, but the important point to note is that just about the ONLY reason for having a comma is to reflect a pause in speech.

Getting technical, OP's adverbial clause like having a garden inside your apartment is more naturally parsed as a sentence adverb. That's why there's a pause before it, to reflect the fact that preceding It looked weird is being "separated out" as a "sentence" for the syntactic purpose here.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .