Is there a word for pant sleeves? I know that 'sleeves' is used for sweaters, but what about pants? I don't think the phrase 'sleeve pants' is idiomatic. Is it? By pant sleeves, I obviously mean the part that covers the entire leg.

| improve this question | | | | |
  • 5
    Did you try looking this up? A quick search for "what do you call pant sleeves" brought up the answer for me. – Kat May 18 '19 at 16:39

They're called legs as well, more specifically trouser legs or pant legs:

a cloth covering consisting of the part of a pair of trousers that covers a person's leg

(source: vocabulary.com)

Which one you should use depends on the continent; the clothing is usually called trousers in the UK and pants in the US, so given your question you should go with pant legs.

| improve this answer | | | | |
  • "...the clothing is usually called trousers in the UK and pants in the US..." Sometimes to much hilarity, as over here in the UK, pants (as a noun) means underpants (as an adjective, pants means really bad). But we know what Americans mean when they say it. :-) – T.J. Crowder May 19 '19 at 16:01

This part is the "trouser leg". I believe in American English "pant leg" or "pantleg" is also used.

| improve this answer | | | | |
  • 7
    Or "pants leg", as weird as that might sound. – Andrew May 18 '19 at 14:46
  • @Andrew Yes. Grammatical or not, pants leg tends to be the most common in spoken American English everywhere I've ever lived. – CodeGnome May 19 '19 at 14:53

Back in Tudor times sleeves were separate items, particularly for women's dresses. They would be held on on with ribbons or buttons. So a particular word came about. At that time, pants didn't even exist. The modern-day trousers as middle class dress didn't really come about until sometime around the 18th century. Breeches would have been formal dress before then.The separate leg covering word you are looking for is "hose", knitted stockings that would cover the leg while the breeches stopped at the thigh (Tudor era) or, later on, the knee.

| improve this answer | | | | |
  • 3
    This isn't the word the asker is looking for at all. The asker is in the 21st century, not in Tudor times. – David Richerby May 19 '19 at 22:25
  • 3
    It's also wrong, IIRC. The reason why they're called "pants" is because they were originally two different garments: one for each leg. – nick012000 May 20 '19 at 3:01
  • It's also the wrong item of clothing. Hose is occasionally used these days (hence the word hosiery for underwear which is still in widespread use in more formal contexts such as shops) but it is more likely to be called stockings or tights for examples made from much thinner fabric, or leggings for something which is very similar to the original hose. – Graham May 20 '19 at 8:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.