2

The animal was really a puma. The animal really was a puma.

What is the difference between these two sentences?

1

The animal was really a puma.

I would expect this to be a contradiction to a previous assumption. Something like:

We thought the animal was a big housecat but upon further inspection it was really a puma.

The animal really was a puma.

I would expect this formation when you are contradicting an incorrect disbelief about what the animal was (in other words the initial assumption was correct, but hard to believe):

Fred thought he saw a puma but the group knew pumas were extremely rare where they were. Once they got closer, they realized the animal really was a puma.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.